THE LEADERS THAT WERE
-HOW OUR COUNTRY FORMIDABLY LACKS
WHAT MUST BE
It’s the dawn of a new era as the Indian national flag
flutters proudly over the clear blue horizon, a raring beacon of hope on the
advancing 66th year of national independence. The glorious past is
now embedded in the citizens’ minds as intricately as a beautiful folk lore;
two centuries of struggle in a gist, which if asked to re-iterate, a common
Indian would state mere 40% correctly. The tireless struggle to claim the
birthright of every Bharatiya over the motherland seems very much like the
ill-gotten remains of a magnificent couture brought to a great fall, lying
dormant in remains waiting for the right patron to arrive and dig out the history.
This lust is insatiable as the descendants of the heroes must dedicate
themselves to the consequent realms of a free nation, participating extensively
in all its corrupt practices, war, riots, every kind of violence imaginable. An
enthusiast may rise every now and then to raise the ugly questions, “Where’s
the passion? Where’s the loyalty? Where’s thy love for motherland?” the answer
is deafening silence mingled with the following questions: What is the
enthusiast on? Which drug is strong enough to set afresh memories of love long
forgotten and dead almost as soon as the independence was achieved? What
rotten, twisted, ancient, foolishly idealistic individual seeks nation before
self? Plain drama it is! Severely attention-seeking behavior!!
It was the 7th century when the Golden Bird first faced foreign
attack as brought on by Muhammad Bin Qasim and by the end of the next century
the roots of foreign emperors had strengthened and their cruel ambitions
fiercely fueled by the conquests of Multan and Sindh, laying path for some of
the bloodiest chapters of Indian history. Gradually, the entire Indian
sub-continent with the exceptions of the present day Himachal
Pradesh , Nepal ,
Uttarakhand , Sikkim
and Bhutan ,
fell in the hands of Mughal rulers. The frequent brawls and petty power
struggles amongst the Rajput rulers led the Sultans on to further empower their
territories while making sure that no significant rebellion against these
tyrants was ever taken up. Jealousy took the better of Daulat Khan Lodi, the
then governor of Lahore and the
ruler of Mewar, Rana Sanga as they invited Babur to attack the principal army
of Ibrahim Lodi. The mighty rulers of the Delhi Sultanate were overthrown in a
battle of power so tyrannous that it left little to the imagination. After the
Battle of Panipat, Babur reigned supreme. The belittled Rana Sanga and Daulat
Khan, who had fathomed Babur’s departure in succession of his mighty conquest,
were given important positions in what was to become a foreign rule where the
Badshah planned to set roots in a foreign land and alter the course of history
forever.
The later Mughuls were, in many ways, everything that their
ancestors weren’t. Rulers with extremely low self-esteem who lacked control and
failed to command respect from the subjects, were easily enticed by a monarchy
which lured them into a slothful slumber and in turn, demanded power for the
Queen. Now, the golden bird was caged to never fly again. The establishment of
the East India Company and its rapid expansion was the consequence of the honey-trap
that was carefully placed to wrap the dummy rulers in its warm, embracing arms
and carefully so. Pulling the wool over their eyes meant deceiving them with
bountiful offerings, including ego-boosts and noteworthy praise in the memoirs of
travelers. And so the last of the Mughuls lent out our motherland on lease,
piece-by-piece till there were none left. The end of Bahadur Shah Zafar in Burma
is proof of the loyal friends the British were.
A century of unspeakable and unforgettable totalitarianism
rowed a nation to rebel.
It is when tyranny reaches zenith that leaders like Lala Lajpat
rai, Bhagat Singh, Swami Vivekanand, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Chandra Shekhar
Azad, Subhash Chandra Bose are created. The saga of their pristine sacrifice to
achieve the impossible is legendary. Two centuries later, the independent
republic of “India ”
was born.
The present scenario isn’t much different. How is charging
thousand for a commodity worth only ten not a felony? How is the present ridiculously
high rate of inflation any different from the unjustified prices during British
rule? How does one justify the horrendous crimes against women as against those
made by our oppressors? If the foreign rulers were accused of misusing their
power, then how exactly aren’t the present-day politicians abusing their
authority? While we blame the outsiders for prowling our motherland, have we
ever considered what difference does it make when Indians like Kalmadi do the
same? My question is: If democracy is “for the people, by the people”, then why
is the world’s largest democracy behaving like a slave?
On the flip side, if the tyranny is intact so should be the
rebellion. Where are the Bhagat Singhs of today? What are they doing? What
shackles bind them? Why can’t the world have another Vivekanand? There has to
be an unyielding reason as to why there are only politicians in India
today and no leaders.
JAI HIND!
It was the 7th century when the Golden Bird first faced foreign attack as brought on by Muhammad Bin Qasim and by the end of the next century the roots of foreign emperors had strengthened and their cruel ambitions fiercely fueled by the conquests of Multan and Sindh, laying path for some of the bloodiest chapters of Indian history. Gradually, the entire Indian sub-continent with the exceptions of the present day
Jai Hind..
ReplyDeleteA well written though some-what over-simplified point of view. I would digress the fact that there are no leaders in India, it is just that they are not view and never followed as leaders. There are no organisations barring major political parties that hold rallies and clarion calls, there is no issue that is not politicized OR can be viewed from the point of view of the benefactors.
ReplyDeleteJust today morning I opened the newspaper and there was this huge infomercial covering the entire page published in so-called PUBLIC INTEREST by Green Peace [India chapter], it called for terminating the nuclear projects in India as they pollute the environment at its bottom it proudly proclaimed that the same was placed in all news-dailies of India thanks to the contribution of over 2,00,000 members. I just wish that instead of a show of strength they could have lit up a few of the villages in the badlands of Bihar, UP and Jharkhand, Chattishgarh heck Madhya Pradesh using their Green technology it would have proven the point instead in true Indian fashion they offered lip-service and nothing more. Remove these nuke-power reactors and the next time the nation plunges into darkness for 6, 8... 24 hours you now know who to thank. Ironically the largest section of Green Peace [India] is their fund-raiser section which [sic] employs a total of 300+ staff across the country. Our largest department is our face to face fundraising unit with close to 200+ staff. Face priorities.
My moot point is before we call out, call within and see what we have done.
Don't get this tirade wrong, if you think I am an anti-social and non-patriotic citizen of this country I am fine with it. Jai Hind!
Thanks for sharing your opinions. I truly respect your point of view.
DeleteThe whole aim is to truly progress towards "India Shining" and if that is being done in some way, hats off to the attempt and such organisations!
Calls for a good debate. But all i'd say is, i feel enriched, with history :P
ReplyDeletePS: A nice pic at the end. :)
Thank you so much! :)
Delete